Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 219W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV516
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

219W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy