Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD FirePro S7150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +459%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tonga
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy