Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (236W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
4880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +1789%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
80
240
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GV100
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy