Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD FirePro R5000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD FirePro R5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
AMD FirePro R5000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro R5000 +103%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

236W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy