Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro W600 +23%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
240
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

236W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy