Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
Lower TDP (236W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 7 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280 +4%
0.622 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
30
240
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GT200B
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy