Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +5036%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
48
240
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 32
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Board Design

236W
TDP
190W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy