Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (236W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
5136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +10271%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
320bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
84
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
5376
80
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 31
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy