Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc A380

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc A380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Arc A380 +492%
4.198 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net