NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+1028%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Capsaicin
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0
