NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro V5800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800
+55%
1.104 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
204W
TDP
74W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Juniper
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
