NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (84W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+168%
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
12
240
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
204W
TDP
84W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G92
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
