NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
+158%
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
8
240
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
