NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (204W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+13%
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
30
240
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
219W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G92B
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
