NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
8208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+6128%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
66
240
Shading Units
8448
80
TMUs
264
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
285W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
