NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
9488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080
+6784%
48.74 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
76
240
Shading Units
9728
80
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
320W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD103
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
