NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+709%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Ellesmere
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
