NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro VII
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro VII
+1744%
13.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
60
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
408.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.11 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.06 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.528 TFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Vega 20
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS
(215-0914026)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
