NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
+1114%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Fiji
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
