NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT
+633%
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 14
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
