NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
17936 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada
+12761%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
142
240
Shading Units
18176
80
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
