NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
T1000
+253%
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU117
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
