Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +512%
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
10
240
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA107
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy