NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs Intel Arc Pro A50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50
+579%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
