Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD FirePro RG220

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 +785%
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
240
Shading Units
80
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
M93
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

204W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy