NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs AMD FirePro W5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000
+78%
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
