Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +1357%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
165W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy