Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +24%
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
448bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
24
240
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT200B
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy