Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2064 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB +597%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK110B
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy