Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +496%
0.596 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
1
240
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

289W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF119
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy