NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA P104 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 4GB VRAM P104 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P104 100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
P104 100
+1016%
6.655 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
15
240
Shading Units
1920
80
TMUs
120
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
104.0 GFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.655 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
208.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GP104
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
GP104-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
