Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295 +473%
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
80
80
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

289W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cedar
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy