CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
+425%
3.133 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
VS
Radeon PRO W6300
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
32bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon HD 5730
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy