NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (289W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
17936 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+15178%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
142
240
Shading Units
18176
80
TMUs
568
28
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
