Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +334%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

7
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
336
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.814 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
39.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
941.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
78.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy