CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1280GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (133.9GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 215W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
+323%
1.089 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
VS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
837 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
1280MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
133.9GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
32
40
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
34.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1089 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
GT215
GT215-400-A2
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
215W
TDP
69W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon X1050
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs AMD FirePro S10000
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA P104 100
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs Intel Xe DG1 SDV
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6290
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy