Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 +648%
1.078 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
35W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
RV630
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy