CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
AMD Radeon Pro V620
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620
+1781%
20.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
VS
Radeon Pro V620
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
72
512
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
375W
TDP
300W
750 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy