Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +1754%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
130W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Navi 33
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy