NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+2037%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
40
512
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
33.73 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
1078 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
100W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
AD104
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
