Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (152.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1280GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 210W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 +163%
1.312 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 500
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

1280MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
152.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
40.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1312 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
164.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

210W
TDP
105W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
RV670
GF110-270-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy