Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (170W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
1.263 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +532%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 500
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
8
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.17 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
52.67 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1263 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy