NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (170W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI350X
+5419%
72.09 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jan 2025
GeForce 500
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
256
8
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
54.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2252.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
576.7 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.09 TFLOPS
108.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.09 TFLOPS
Board Design
170W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
CDNA Next
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
3 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
185 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
