NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA PG506 232

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages

Lower TDP (134W vs 165W)

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1440MHz vs 1032MHz)

More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)

2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

1.585 TFLOPS

PG506 232 +551%

10.32 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

VS

PG506 232

Graphics Card

Mar 2013

Release Date

Apr 2021

GeForce 600

Generation

Tesla

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz

Base Clock

930 MHz

1032 MHz

Boost Clock

1440 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

1215 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

24GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM2

192bit

Memory Bus

3072bit

144.2GB/s

Bandwidth

933.1GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

56

-

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

3584

64

TMUs

224

24

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

224

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per SMX)

L1 Cache

192 KB (per SM)

384 KB

L2 Cache

24 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.51 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

138.2 GPixel/s

66.05 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

322.6 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

10.32 TFLOPS

1.585 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.32 TFLOPS

66.05 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106

GPU Name

GA100

GK106-240-A1

GPU Variant

-

Kepler

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

7 nm

2.54 billion

Transistors

54.2 billion

221 mm²

Die Size

826 mm²

Board Design

134W

TDP

165W

300 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.1

Vulkan

N/A

3.0

CUDA

8.0

5.1

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA A2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 3830

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT Dual

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon HD 4720

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance