NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
1.425 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+115%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 600
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
59.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
1425 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
59.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
