NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
+186%
1.425 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
59.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1425 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
59.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
110W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
RV670
GK106-220-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
