Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1032MHz
Lower TDP (140W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
1.981 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +313%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
960
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
82.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1.981 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
82.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

140W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy