NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1177MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
0.73 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+725%
6.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 600M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
30.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
729.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
30.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
