NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages

Lower TDP (195W vs 1000W)

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 74% (1837MHz vs 1058MHz)

More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)

15360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

3.25 TFLOPS

B200 SXM 192 GB +1810%

62.08 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

VS

B200 SXM 192 GB

Graphics Card

Apr 2013

Release Date

Jan 2024

GeForce 600

Generation

Tesla Blackwell

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz

Base Clock

1665 MHz

1058 MHz

Boost Clock

1837 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

96GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM3e

256bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

192.3GB/s

Bandwidth

4100GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

132

-

Compute Units

-

1536

Shading Units

16896

128

TMUs

528

32

ROPs

24

-

Tensor Cores

528

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per SMX)

L1 Cache

256 KB (per SM)

512 KB

L2 Cache

50 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

44.09 GPixel/s

135.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

969.9 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

248.3 TFLOPS

3.250 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

62.08 TFLOPS

135.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104

GPU Name

GB100

GK104-400-A2

GPU Variant

-

Kepler

Architecture

Blackwell

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

3.54 billion

Transistors

208 billion

294 mm²

Die Size

Unknown

Board Design

195W

TDP

1000W

450 W

Suggested PSU

1400 W

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

No outputs

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.1

Vulkan

N/A

3.0

CUDA

9.0

5.1

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

2

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

6

NVIDIA P104 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 X2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA P106 090

Related News

1

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

2

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

3

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

4

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

5

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

6

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

7

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

8

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

9

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

10

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly