Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro RG220

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 195W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition +3962%
3.25 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2013
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
80
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

195W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
M93
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy